The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court on Friday to review a restrictive order that temporarily blocks its use of the 18th-century wartime immigration law to immediately deport Venezuelan nationals, including members of the alleged approval of Gang Tren de Aragua from U.S. soil.
The appeal was filed shortly after DC. The Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday ruled 2-1 that the lower court decided to temporarily block the government from using the Alien Enemy Act within 14 days so that judges have time to review the case.
If the three DC judges panel further prevented them from using the 1798 wartime law to enforce their deportation agenda, the Trump administration vowed to appeal the ruling to the Supreme Court.
Trump attempted to use the Foreign Enemy Act to deport members of the alleged violence of Venezuelan gang Tren de Alaguya. (Getty Image)
In filings, U.S. attorney Sarah Harrmis told the Supreme Court that the lower court’s “flawed “orders” threaten sensitive government negotiations with foreign powers and that the risk “is serious and possibly irreparable harm” “if not reviewed immediately.”
The Trump administration said at least, the Supreme Court should grant administrative stays to allow them to continue using the Foreign Enemy Act to deport Venezuelan nationals, while the court held that the government’s order.
They also severely criticized the appeals court’s ruling on Wednesday. The U.S. Circuit wrote for the 2-1 majority in the Court of Appeals ruling, with Bush appointee Karen Henderson and Obama-appointed Patricia Millett focusing on concerns about due process violations, as well as complaints of immediate and irreparable harm brought against plaintiffs.
In his agreement with a lower court judge, Henderson said Trump was allowed to use the law in recent times to “exit plaintiffs to land that is not his country of origin.”
“Serious Deficits”: U.S. Judge Rennes Trump Administrator’s Date Deportation Information
“Stock favors the plaintiff,” Henderson said. “And the District Court entered the tros for typical valid purposes: to protect its remedy for a long enough time to consider the arguments of the parties.
Millett said he would comment on the plaintiff’s claims with the Trump administration and immediately delete it beyond the scope of his lawyer or court. ”
Click here to get the Fox News app
The Trump administration continues to oppose the court ruling, and White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt described to Fox News Wednesday as “unauthorized infringement” by the president’s authority.
Levitt added that the administration will act quickly to seek Supreme Court review to defend the president’s power, defend the constitution and make the United States safe again. ”
This is a shocking news story. Please check now for updates.
Haley Chi-Sing of Fox News Digital contributed to the report.
