Department internal threat plans, e.g. Health and Public Services,,,,, transportationand Veterans Affairspolicies were also established to protect unclassified government information, which allowed them to monitor employee clicks and communications, an announcement in the Federal Gazette, which is the official source of rulemaking documents. policy Ministry of the Interiorthis IRSand Federal Deposit Insurance Companyalso allows the collection and evaluation of employees’ social media content.
These internal agencies are planned to be supervised by a national task force led by the Attorney General and the Minister of National Intelligence to identify behaviors that may indicate not only increased risk of leakage and workplace violence, but also “loss” or “degradation” of federal agenciesResources or capabilities. “More than 60% of internal threat incidents in the federal department involve fraud, such as stealing money or taking away someone’s personal information, and are related to non-agency analyze Carnegie Mellon researchers.
“Fraud“Dissatisfied”, “Ideological Challenges“”Moral angerAccording to the U.S. government training literature, “or discussion of ethical issues that are considered “unrelated to job responsibilities” are some possible signs that workers pose a threat.
There are at least nine contracts, based on 15 cabinet-level departments, such as Energy, Labor and Veterans Affairs, signed late last year with suppliers such as Everfox and DTEX Systems, that allow digital monitoring of some employees. Public expenditure data. Everfox declined to comment.
The interception software for DTEX used by multiple federal agencies is an example of a newer category of individual risk scores by analyzing anonymous metadata, according to the company. According to the company, when an agent wants to identify and further investigate people with high scores, two people must sign with certain versions of the tool. DTEX’s software does not have to record keystrokes or scan the content of emails, calls, chats or social media posts.
But this is not how the government operates widely throughout the government, where it explicitly warns employees. Repeated news When they start their devices, they have “no reasonable expectations” in communications or any data stored or transmitted through a government network. The question remains to what extent Doge’s agents rely on existing monitoring programs to carry out Trump’s mission to quickly Eliminate federal workers His administration believes it is with the president’s agenda or infidelity.
DTEX’s chief technology officer Rajan Koo told Wired that he hopes the Trump administration can adjust the administration’s surveillance method. He said incidents such as widespread layoffs and reliance on what Koo calls invasive surveillance tools can inspire an environment where workers feel displeased. “You can build a culture of mutual loyalty,” Koo said.
Have lost what to do
Understanding the source of the U.S. government’s internal threat program describes it as inefficient and labor-intensive, requiring an overstretched team of analysts to pass daily alerts, including many false alarms. Several sources said the systems are currently “overwhelmed”. Any efforts by the Trump administration to extend the scope of such tools or expand its parameters – for example, closer surveillance of signs of disobedience or disloyalty by partisan Filty, which is likely to lead to a huge false positive According to people familiar with the work, it’s time to sort it out.
exist Last month’s email seek Federal employees voluntarily resignthe Trump administration wrote, it wants a “reliable, loyal, trustworthy workforce.” Trying to implement this vision using an insider threat program can achieve this vision through many legal challenges.
