Then Eric Chonga 37-year-old has a background in the dental field and has previously co-founded a startup that simplifies the cost of dentist medical care. He was placed in the “machine” team.
“I’ll tell the truth, saying I’m very happy to be on the machine team,” Chong said.
At Hackathon, Chong is building software that uses voice and facial recognition to detect autism. Of course, my first question is: No wealth This problem, such as biased data causing false positives?
“Yes, yes,” Zheng said. “I think there might be some false positives, but I think, with voice and facial expressions, I think we can actually improve the accuracy of early detection.”
agi’Atacover’
Like many things related to AI in San Francisco, co-working spaces are linked to effective altruism.
If you are not familiar with Bombshell headlinesit tries to maximize the benefits of participants’ time, money and resources. The day after the event, the event space discussed how to use YouTube to “communicate important ideas such as why people should eat less meat.”
On the fourth floor of the building, flyers cover the walls – “AI 2027: Will Agi agi atavover” shows the announcement of the recently passed taco party, another titled “Pro-Weapons Cooperation” without any other background.
Half an hour before the submission deadline, coders chewed vegetarian meatballs from Ike’s and were eager to finish their project. On the first floor down, the judge began to arrive: Brian Fioca and Shyamal Hitesh Anadkat Applied AI team from Openai, Marius Buleandra From anthropomorphic application AI team, Varin Nairan engineer at an AI startup factory (This is also the co-consequence of the incident).
When the jury began, Nate Rush, a member of the Met team, showed me an Excel table tracking contestants’ scores, AI-powered group color green and human project color red. When the judges make a decision, each group moves up and down the list. “Did you see it?” he asked me. No, I don’t do that – even half an hour in the judgement, the mix of colors has no obvious winners. That’s his point of view. Surprisingly, Man versus Machine is a close match.
show time
Finally, the finalists are evenly distributed: from the “people” side, three are divided into three with “machine”. After each demonstration, the crowd was asked to raise his hands to guess whether the team had used AI.
First is ViewSense, a tool designed to help people with visual disabilities browse their surroundings in the context by browsing live videos into text for screen readers to read aloud. Given the short build time, this is technically impressive, and 60% of the rooms (by the emcee count) think it uses AI. No.
Next comes a team that builds a platform for designing websites with pens and paper, using cameras to track sketches in real time without having to participate in the coding process. The Pianist Project goes to the finals through a system that allows users to upload piano sessions for AI-generated feedback; it is on the machine side. Another team showed a tool that generates a heat map of code changes: key security issues are shown in red, while routine editing takes green as an example. This does use AI.
