In another vote, the consultant recommended adding lens risks to the vaccine’s information table, which is required by law.
The committee’s focus on Covid-19-19 vaccines reflects Kennedy’s long-standing suspicion about them. Since taking office in February, Kennedy has $500 million mRNA vaccine research canceled And ended their main contract with ModernA, one of the modern vaccines, for work on the pandemic bird flu vaccine.
At Friday’s meeting, CDC scientists presented a large amount of data on the safety and effectiveness of vaccines. They also explained in detail how the agency tracks Covid hospitalizations and said the agency has a “rigorous and standardized process” to determine if hospitalizations are attributed to Covid-19.
During the discussion section of the meeting, committee members made several baseless claims. Robert Malone, former mRNA researcher, Spreading vaccine error messagequestion whether there is actually evidence that the disease is immune to shootings. “Is there a clear definition, characterized by, is it COVID protection, is it or is it?” he asked.
Cody Meissner, a pediatrician at Dartmouth College, replied that “there is a reasonable measure of neutralizing or binding antibodies that are associated with protection against symptomatic infections in the first few months.”
At one time, Hilary Blackburn, the committee’s pharmacist, questioned whether the co-vaccine could be linked to the mother’s lung cancer diagnosis, which took place two years after receiving the Covid vaccine. She said she knew her small hometown was diagnosed with the same cancer. “Is this related to the vaccine?” she asked.
In a tense exchange about potential birth defects associated with co-vaccines, some ACIP members impose manufacturer Pfizer Eight birth defects This occurred in a group of pregnant women receiving the company’s vaccines and had two birth defects in the unvaccinated population. Alejandra Gurtman, head of clinical research and development at Pfizer vaccine, replied that these rates are comparable to the rate of congenital abnormalities in the general population.
Carol Hayes, a contact person at the American nurse-Medways College who attended during the meeting, clarified that most birth defects appeared in the first month of pregnancy, and in the cited study, the mother received the vaccine at 12 to 24 weeks of pregnancy.
At Friday’s meeting, the committee also reversed the decision of the previous day. Thursday, Consultant vote no longer recommends Measles, mumps, rubies and chickenpox (MMRV) vaccine combined with children under 4 years of age. But confusingly, it voted to maintain coverage of the vaccine through the federal children program, which provides free vaccines for low-income children and has no insurance. On Friday, they voted to decide that the plan should not actually cover it.
On Friday, the consultants also voted to pass 11-on-one decisions in favor of a decision on whether to postpone the birth dose of the hepatitis B vaccine until one month old. The committee has discussed the vaccines that were extensive on Thursday, although it is not clear why the committee was asked to study potential changes, as the hepatitis B vaccine has been provided to newborns in the United States since 1991.
Babies receive vaccines before leaving the hospital because the virus can be passed on to the baby from an infected mother at birth. Hepatitis B is a serious liver infection that can cause cirrhosis and cancer. The vaccine is very effective in preventing neonatal infections.
Chari Cohen, chairman of the Hepatitis C Foundation, told Wired that there is no scientific reason to postpone the hepatitis B vaccine until one month after birth, she is concerned about the increase in hepatitis B infections if the panel ultimately recommends delaying immunization.
“We may see more infected babies and toddlers,” Cohen said. “From the perspective of public health infrastructure, we are worried that this risk-based approach will miss out on preventing infections from babies infected with infected mothers.”
Up to 16% of HBV-positive pregnant women will not be tested for hepatitis B, so screening does not capture all infected mothers.
“We don’t understand the motivation or reason for this debate,” Cohen said.
