Washington – In the last week of the Last year’s presidential campaign, House Speaker Mike Johnson began easily Walk back back he makes While standing next to a vulnerable Member of the Republican New York.
Johnson promised to eliminate the chips and scientific actions when Donald Trump becomes President – a position he can easily learn to be unpopular with battle districts.
“The chips Act is not on the agenda for quitting,” Johnson, R-la., Said a statement that soon followed his comments in October.
Following alive slitcAlsooverage here
Fast to Tuesday, and Trump, today’s president, Johnson asked the camera in a Congress television country: The chips returned.
“Your chips Act is a terrible, terrible thing,” Trump says, talking about the Democrats who informed an investment in Taiwanese, and it did not mean something. “
“Everything important to them they don’t want to pay the tariffs,” Trump continues, before Johnson is assigned directly. “You have to take the action of chips. And whatever is left, G. Speaker, you must use it to reduce debt. Or any other reason you want.”
While Johnson continued to stand up and clapped to Trump’s suggestion, receiving Wednesday from other Republicans was Farrier. However the Republicans learned Trump’s disobedience to the legislation, senior lawmakers did not give a head Trump made to his joint address whenever ever before.
“We have so many things higher in the list,” a top President of the Republican said the Aide. “I doubt it can be answered in any future package.”
“I have not seen a large appetite,” echoed a senior Senate Republican Aide.
The legislation passed by Congress with Bipartisan support and signed by President Joe Biden’s law in 2022. Offered new funds in semicondicts and chipster and development. The funds were given Of projects at approximately two dozen states, according to the National Institute of Standits and Technology of Commerce Department of and Technology.
“I’m not sure what he really got there,” the Senate Senate Leader Juan Thanun, Rs.D., said. “There are some questions on what this statement means, but there are ways we need to get all these restrictions on how to spend. He’s right about that, no question about that.”
Trump, As well as some conservativescriticized the legislation while offering subsidies for the rich companies, with the President suggesting that tariffs are more effective in opening the US shop
Talking to reporters on Wednesday, Johnson said there is a “job that needs to be done to address the chips that are executed by law.
He added that the Republicans “wait for Trump’s” Future Budget Service “see how he manage” the chips work before making any decisions.
“There is a lot of talk and discussion about it,” Johnson said.
However the Republican senators who support the law seized by Trump’s words in his Tuesday address.
Sen Todd Young, R-Ind., Said Wednesday that they conflict with securities he was given to Trump’s nominees to secure his vote for their confirmation.
“I have to admit, I wonder,” Child, the Leading Republic of the legislation, tells journalists. “His comments are as stressful in the commitments I have received in private and public from his current cabinet [members]assurance that I am looking for to support some nominees. ”
Young person said he was arrived at the White House after the address.
“We work with them, seeking explanations,” he added. “I remain optimistic and frankly I expect we stay active acting on them to improve the program, and that’s looking at the future.”
Seventeen Senate Republics voted to support the legislation of 2022, even if some of the members were no longer senators. At home, only one congressman-voted support – the dead now Rep. Don Young, R-Alaska.
Legislation is largely considered a successful effort to jump in the chip making in the country.
“I don’t think that’s likely to happen,” Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, Said Wednesday when asked if he would support a repeal of the legislation, which he was backed in 2022. “The origins of the program started back in his administration, and I think investments made in the United States and ITHER companies, and it’s Made it possible now for the president to Announce this additional huge investment by TSMC for advanced semiconductor production. “
Lindsey Graham, Rs.C., a fellow supporter of the law, said he was curious to see what was in mind.
“I want to see what he replaces it,” he said. “Generally speaks, I want to bring in the chip manufacting here, but if he has a different way of doing it, I’m open.”
A second senior GOP Senate Aide said that Republicans may not even change the chips in the coming weeks, given the necessary spending fees.
“I don’t think there’s a time with what’s supposed to do on the floor,” as this person. “Chips can be complicated by real unpacking as well as it has financial hooks in states.”
Ang lider sa Senado nga minorya nga si Chuck Schumer, DN.Y., usa ka lead tagsulat sa lehise nga gisuportahan sa mga miyembro sa duha ka mga partido, nga magpadayon sa pag-abut sa among mga partido, ug ipadayon ang among mga gimbuhaton sa lungsod, ug ipadayon ang among mga gimbuhaton sa lungsod, ug ipadayon ang paghimo sa among mga partido, ug ipadayon ang among mga gimbuhaton sa nasud, ug ipadayon ang paghimo sa among mga partido, ug ipadayon ang pag-abut In our kinds, and keep our bonds to the supply, and keep our works in the city, and keep our tasks to members, and keep our support chains from abroad. “
“People feel the positive effects and new economic energy in their towns in each corner of America, from Ohio to Arizona,” Arizona said. “I don’t think the President will find a lot of Congress support for preventing investments in chips and the amount of work they do.”
Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis.
“It sounds like a sound, which helps us with the economy, and we must stand behind,” says Baldwin.
The law is passed under 60-vote threshold, which means it will require 60 votes of the Senate to reverse. Republicans have 53 seats.
“We have found this administration with a large regular progress in Congress. … We see some of this scale,” Baldwin said. “I didn’t suggest that we are. I just say, we’ve seen that in other arenas.”
Johnson’s Backtrack of last fall arrived while he was in the district of a member who saw benefits from the legislation, previously-rep. Brandon Williams, RN.Y., promotes potential political backlash for finding the removal of legislation.
After Johnson said the Republicans were likely to eliminate chips standing next to his side and promised “reminder” the importance of law.
“If that’s an important thing for your district, you need this person there to do that case,” Johnson replied.
Shortly after wrapped in public comments, Johnson released a statement that the legislation is not to dismiss the requirements of the law and eliminate its requirements. ”
Williams told a statement that he took part in Johnson’s private after the movement and that the speaker “apologized, saying that he followed the question.”
Finally Williams lost his race at home. In January, Trump has chosen him to be undersecretary of the energy department for nuclear security.
Allan Smith reported from New York; Frank Thorp V, Sahil Kapur and Julie Tsirkin reported from Washington, DC
