Blog Post

Prmagazine > News > News > Pink bicycles or a cure for cancer: How do you believe our money should be spent?
Pink bicycles or a cure for cancer: How do you believe our money should be spent?

Pink bicycles or a cure for cancer: How do you believe our money should be spent?

Join Fox News to access this content

Plus your account’s special access selection articles and other quality content – free.

By entering an email and pushing for a continuation, you agree to Fox News terms of use and Privacy Policywhich includes ours Economic Incentive Notice.

Please enter a valid email address.

NewYou can listen to Fox News articles now!

I’ve fought Various federal agencies For twenty years, he was the first to represent Wyoming and small businesses and is currently the sole representative of Wyoming in the U.S. House of Representatives. I’m very proficient in agency structures, terms, procedures and mentality, especially in Congress oversight and resource allocation.

Considering the discussion surrounding the president Donald TrumpI think the creation of causes of eliminating waste, fraud and abuse in the executive branch is important to reveal the ways federal agencies historically avoid responsibility while shifting resources to adopt policies that Americans do not want, which Congress never approved, and contrary to their purpose and mission.

I often refer to agent assignment as the “pink bike effect.” Take the National Institutes of Health (NIH) for example and for $1 million to choose between curing cancer or buying a pink bike (a little ridiculous tongue), they will choose a pink bike. Why? Because the incentive structure of spending public funds is completely different from that of the incentives that motivate the private sector.

Ace and fall images

After decades of deficit spending, the agency’s condition is how much money their plans will be available. (Fox News/Getty Images)

Institutional conditions, after Decades of deficit spendingthink how much money their plans can be used, no matter how stupid or unnecessary, because Congress never forced them to justify their spending or hold them accountable.

Trump is popular, as is his many policies. Democrats in tanks

More insidiously, agents spend taxpayers’ money on ridiculous things because they inspire to do so through our appropriation process. These agencies believe they can direct money to buying pink bikes and when asked to cure cancer, they lag behind the tried and tested answer of “Congress didn’t give us enough money!”

Under a functional system, Congress will respond to these agents’ mischiefs by using specific instructions to address specific instructions for cancer. But, unfortunately, there is no such incentive structure yet, Congress allocates annually to cancer while watching agents buy “pink bikes”, or, like the NIH, in Wuhan, China, China, and torture the beagle.

A recent experience related to institutional misleading assets involves Attorney General Merrick Garland. On June 4, 2024, I asked about Garland at a Judicial Committee hearing Mexican drug cartel Invasion remains due to Biden’s disastrous open policy.

The whole truth about great things can and can’t be done

When faced with human trafficking, drug smuggling and community destruction, Garland brought out the same tired excuse, “Congress didn’t give us money. … Sadly, his excuse can only confirm the “pink bicycle effect.”

The Justice Department spent millions of dollars to prevent Trump’s 2016 election, undermining his ability to serve as president and turning our court system into a Democratic political division. However, when asked a simple question why the FBI does not protect tribes from drug and human traffickers, Garland restored the classic excuse to ignore every necessary resource required by the Justice Department’s visit (including asking President Joe Biden, the president who closed the border) to protect India’s bookings.

Merrick Garland testified on Capitol Hill in 2024. AP/Jacquelyn Martin)

Attorney General Merrick Garland testified at a House Judiciary Committee hearing on Capitol Hill on June 4, 2024. AP/Jacquelyn Martin)

Let’s now Consider what Doge found In exposing corruption and waste: $250,000 to increase “vegetarian local climate action innovation” in Zambia; Colombia’s “inclusive justice” is $74 million; $52 million is for the thorough evil world economic forum; $40 million is for “improving social and economic inclusion for sedentary immigrants”, and $40 million is for the Taliban and many other terrorist organizations a weekly offer to the Taliban.

Click here for more Fox News comments

I hope Doge will eventually spend hundreds of billions of dollars worldwide, plans that are downright non-American and a huge misleading of assets – undermining the foundations of our as a culture.

Congress never allocated funds for these specific programs. Instead, Congress allocated funds to institutions that expected them to manage these resources according to the purpose of the creation plan. Congress believes that if these agencies determine their mission as “feeding the poor in Congo,” they are actually feeding the poor in Congo.

No one wants our agents to buy pink bikes with our taxes. We want our Forest Services to manage forests effectively, our Reclamation Bureau operates our federal water infrastructure and builds dams, and our Department of Agriculture to protect our food producers from foreign threats.

Click here to get the Fox News app

We must make it clear that we will no longer tolerate Misleading assets and resources The pursuit of an agenda that the American people do not want, and this does not promote our American interests.

Congress now has the opportunity to recoup its responsibility as a grant, and federal agencies will soon stop buying pink bikes with the assistance of the Governor.

Click here to read more from the rep. Harriet Hargman

Source link

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

star360feedback