NewYou can listen to Fox News articles now!
At a congressional hearing last week, National Public Broadcast Katherine Maher, CEO of (NPR), opens to this: “I welcome the opportunity to discuss the important role of public media in bringing just, nonpartisan, fact-based fact reporting to Americans.”
I suspect Mach simply doesn’t welcome the opportunity – she’s in the popular seats. Mach, who became CEO of NPR In 2023, they wake up like they did, and in the recent past for Trump, “white silence” and “white” are generally in trouble.
During her hearing, she also told Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) that she “never seen any politically biased decisions on the editorial decisions on NPR.”
Exclusive: Republicans move to compensate for “long-term biased” NPR, disastrous post-hearing PBS
I’m sure Maher won’t believe NPR is nonpartisan for a second. Its prejudice is as obvious as the nose on the big bird’s face.
Washington Post Write “NPR has been working to diversify its listeners and provide additional perspectives for years.” Paul du Quenoy of the Palm Beach Liberty Institute described NPR as “a radical left, a source of news for government subsidies.”
While NPR was once a source of extensive news coverage of widespread interest in Americans, it now embodies the stunning power of the air.
Uri Berliner, who worked there for 25 years, took it away. In a regrettable summary of the network’s free media decline, he wrote: “Those who listen to NPR or read its coverage online will find…a distilled worldview of a small portion of the American population.”
Get it from Heritage Foundation scholar Mike Gonzalez, who testified at the same Congressional hearing: “NPR and PBS are nakedly filled with very progressive views”.
It’s not only from theirs Coverage Covid, “Russia Gate” or laptops from Hunter Biden. Analysis of media research services reported by the four-month NPR shows that PBS news periods usually offer free books to conservative guests at nearly 4 to 1 ratio.
It’s been a joke that it’s been tweaking NPR among conservatives and seeing how long it’s been featured in certain aspects of Woke. Players of this game – “How long have you been awake?” – report that the story angle is tilted for no more than five minutes.
No place NPR’s left-wing bias It’s more obvious than their reports on immigration.
Listen to NPR’s Steve Inskeep’s radio since 2015. INSKEEP clearly expresses sympathy for “Junior”, that is, “undocumented” young people are introducing. fair enough. But the journalist now makes nearly half a million dollars a year, but never points out that President Obama grants immigrant benefits (without legal authority) through the Delayed Child Arrival Action (DACA).
Ten years later, the situation is the same. Listen to this radio called Immigration officials become “extreme” in reviewing travelers entering the United States Starting March 23, NPR’s Ayesha Rascoe interviewed Michelle Hackman from the Wall Street Journal.
Rascoe and Hackman complain that customs and border protection officials are more special about enforcing visa holders. But after four years of open borders, it is understandable that officials want support from above and therefore sweat details.
Then there is the NPR article on March 25, Feels like a kidnapping’: The wrong turn leads to 5 days of detention torture. This post is about the Guatemalan family that NPR calls “immigrants without illegal status in the United States,” a way for roundabouts to say “illegal immigration.”
NPR bias For families, it is clearly opposed to the implementation of immigration laws. They interviewed “lawyers,” “experts,” and “advocates,” who told them that “the Trump administration is working on immigration enforcement rules for historic deportation campaigns and immigration crackdowns.”
For this article, NPR did not interview any experts support Implement immigration law. One elected official they quoted was Rashida Tlaib, a Democratic member of Michigan, who is not against President Trump.
I am a retired consul. I have written nearly 200 articles and reports on immigration and border security and conducted about 300 media interviews. Media from the United States and Britain, Europe and Japan interviewed me or introduced my work. NPR did not ask me to comment on a story at a time.
Click here for more Fox News comments
There is no doubt about Google’s “NPR Border” or “NPR Immigration” and its biases. An article said: “How Trump’s crackdown is trapped in misunderstandings about immigration and crime.” Analysts agree that this is my favorite, starting in April 2024: “Immigration continues to come despite reinforced borders. That’s why.” It’s a great option because in April 2024, 247,929 illegal foreigners were encountered at our borders and ports. In February 2025, after Trump’s policy rather than Biden’s policy, it was 28,654.
NPR’s globalist bias leads them to assume that the United States can or should not take any action to prevent illegal mass immigration. They were wrong.
Click here to get the Fox News app
Maher tried to convince Congress to oppose all the evidence that the NPR was just and bipartisan. She wants to keep the $100 million annual subsidy. But, as Congressman James Comer (R-ky.) said at the hearing, this is not 1990 – most Americans today have broadband, podcasts, and a variety of news and other types of programs.
In principle, the state should not subsidize the media. When doing so, from the Soviet Union Pravda and Cuba’s state-owned Granma arrive oneUSTRALIA’s ABC, Canadian CBC and British BBC, the leftist view is always the result.
