Blog Post

Prmagazine > News > News > Opinion: The reported costs of the Los Angeles fires are staggering. The hidden costs are worse
Opinion: The reported costs of the Los Angeles fires are staggering. The hidden costs are worse

Opinion: The reported costs of the Los Angeles fires are staggering. The hidden costs are worse

Destroyed homes, soaring insurance premiums and forest management costs have brought the price of the Los Angeles fire to hundreds of billions of dollars. But these Amazing numbers Covering a dark ledger with decades of climate change fuel More intense and recurring fire.

As the ashes settle, the area faces an invisible threat below the burnt remains: damaged soil structures, contaminated watersheds and ecosystems deprived of natural defenses – the wounds will bleed in the coming years.

This number tells the story of a cruel transformation: California wildfires have burned three-quarters of what they have done over the past three decades. This undermines California’s natural infrastructure that has long supported its prosperity, while conventional metrics fail to capture. The most disturbing data is not the headlines.

Tracking a surge in firefighting costs and insurance losses will miss the attenuation of natural systems that provide water filtration, soil retention and carbon capture. These key natural functions still don’t have our balance sheets – until they start to fail.

The ongoing drought deepened the crisis. California is facing now 78 “Fire Days” Every year – the period of the wildfire ignition period – 50 years ago, welcoming what scholar Stephen Pyne said Tin Tin Age for the fire season throughout the year. In Pacific Palisades, even homeowners who follow every fire guidelines find themselves forced to evacuate in January, a month that hasn’t been in history as a fire season.

Today’s fires are also burning hotter and deeper, changing the landscape in the way centuries of ecological development. When a fire burns from the hillside of the forest, the immediate loss of trees is just the beginning. Carbon capture capacity has dropped sharply as forests are replaced by Chaparral, undermining efforts to mitigate climate change.

When the flames are strong enough to destroy the root system, they also change the soil structure. Once absorbed and filtered water becomes water on the ground. Rainwater that once immersed in the aquifers now competes across the ground, increasing the risk of flash flooding and bringing toxins from burning structures into a multi-million-dollar water system. Water treatment plants face rising costs of pollution runoff, and downstream agricultural land fights irrigation water filled with sediment.

The long-term economic and environmental consequences are enormous. California fires released more than 100 million metric tons of carbon dioxide, They not only offset the state’s progress in reducing emissions; they transformed the state of carbon sinks into carbon sources. After the camp fire in 2018, water officials found benzene and other carcinogens in municipal water supply, so it is necessary Estimated repairs of $300 million. The areas burning since 2017 represent billions of ecosystem values, and any possible recovery is on the timeline of nature rather than ours.

Wildfire management has become a problem of collective action similar to vaccination or flood control, where good choices for individuals cannot guarantee collective safety. A single unlimited property threatens the entire community, just like a poorly managed federal forest overwhelming national resources.

There is a California Tens of millions of dead trees To start for the next big shot, no entity has enough power or resources to deal with the threat. The U.S. Forest Service manages most of California’s land, the state bears most of the fire burden, and private property owners face some of the biggest consequences.

When homeowners invest in refractory materials and protect their property by helping to preserve hillside stability, watershed quality and regional air quality, the wider benefits are not fully captured in insurance premiums and property values. When high-risk areas develop, the cost will be multiplied by One-third of California is located in or near lush vegetation. Even if the insurance company complies with fire safety regulations, the property value is disconnected from environmental risks, and the reconstruction work repeats past mistakes, the insurance company will evacuate the property value even if it complies with fire safety regulations.

A fire can release particulate pollution, which causes thousands of times more damage than greenhouse gases, pollutes the water supply of heavy metals in the combustion structure and makes future fires more likely by changing the landscape, thus revealing Inconsistency between individual choices and community interests.

That’s why we need an integrated approach. Natural systems do not respect administrative boundaries, and our solutions should not respect administrative boundaries. Breaking the cycle of escalating fire damage requires fundamental reorganization of economic incentives to reflect the true value of natural infrastructure.

California stands at the intersection. We can continue to see wildfires as isolated disasters, measuring their costs in burning acres and properties, or we can work together to value and retain our natural defense capabilities together. As the California climate continues to remain warm, the question is no longer whether we have the ability to make these changes, but that we can’t afford it.

Augusto Gonzalez-Bonorino is an economics lecturer at Pomona College.

Source link

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

star360feedback