Federal Judge Grilled Trump administration lawyers On Friday, despite an earlier court order explicitly rejecting the move, the deportation of Venezuelan nationals was the latest lawsuit in a days-long legal dispute that could go to the Supreme Court.
At the motion hearing, U.S. District Court Judge James Boasberg Unable to comply Its use of the Foreign Enemy Act of 1798 is temporarily blocked by an interim court order Venezuelan nationalityincluding suspected members from US soil for 14 days.
At least 261 immigrants were deported from the U.S. El Salvador on Saturday, including more than 100 Venezuelan nationals, who were removed from office “only based” by the law temporarily blocked by the court.
Boasberg used the first part of Friday’s hearing to propose to Ensign for details about the government’s deportation to El Salvador.
“Serious Deficits”: U.S. Judge Rennes Trump Administrator’s Date Deportation Information
U.S. District Court Judge James Boasberg. (Getty) (Getty)
“Why is this declaration signed in the dark early Friday, Saturday morning, and then these people rushed onto the plane?” Boasberg asked the Justice Department attorney. “For me, the only reason for this is if you know the problem and want to take them out of the country before you file a lawsuit.”
His knowledge of deportation was also listed at a court hearing last week when Boasberg ordered the Trump administration to temporarily halt any planned downgrade of Venezuelan immigration but comply with the Foreign Enemy Act.
Boasberg also issued Saturday’s ruling ordering the immediate return of Venezuelan nationals deported under the Foreign Enemy Act.
“I can ask you now how you explain this in the conversation on Saturday?” he asked Eisen. “Don’t you understand my statement at the hearing?”
The judge reminded the lieutenant: “You tell me you don’t have the details of the plane’s flight, and then we held a 38-minute concave to find the details.” “And then, when you come back – even if the plane is in the air, do you mean you don’t have the details of the flight?”
“It’s,” the lieutenant replied, telling the judge that no one would give him the information he was seeking about deportation. “I don’t know they’re in the air,” he said.
Judge vs Trump: This is the main court struggle to stop the White House agenda
The then-Educated President Donald Trump’s personal attorney, Todd Blanche, Emil Bove and John Lauro, left the federal court in Washington, D.C. in 2024. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)
Boasberg ordered Trump administration officials to explain on Tuesday why they failed to comply with his orders, orders for deportation to return, and whether they intend to violate his ruling and land on El Salvador.
Although the judge acknowledged that the Trump administration had a “broad latitude” to enforce immigration laws, he repeatedly expressed frustration at the administration and its failure to answer major questions about flights.
He reiterated the issues on Friday and raised new questions about the government’s obvious contempt for federal judges.
“The assumption is frightening,” Justice Boasberg told Eisen. “If the court cannot review the use of the government’s wartime era deportation law, “the president can say anyone is invading. If some foreign fishermen enter U.S. waters, the president can say it is an invasion,” Boasberg noted.
“Even if you would say it’s shocking,” he said.
Eisen replied: “It depends on Congress.”
Who is U.S. Judge James Boasberg at the center of Trump’s deportation efforts?
President Donald Trump and Attorney General Pam Bondi speak at the Washington Department of Justice on Friday, March 14, 2025. (via AP pool)
Boasberg condemns the Justice Department’s lawyers in court order filed Thursday Failed to answer his question Regarding the deportation flight, even after he asked them to do so, the government “flees again.”
It is unclear whether the Trump administration will invoke state secret privileges in court battles, which can allow them to withhold certain information for national security purposes.
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche told Boasberg in a court statement filed Friday morning that he knew the privilege was invoked by the cabinet-level discussion. They can make this argument at an appeals court hearing next week.
“Invoking privileges” is a serious matter, requiring careful consideration of national security and diplomatic relations and cannot be properly adopted within 24 hours,” Blanche told the court on Friday. ”
Click here to get the Fox News app
President Donald Trump, For his part, he asked the Supreme Court to expel more than 300 federal judges who enforced orders and actions in a social media post Friday.
In truth-society positions, Trump imports the Supreme Court directs “stop the national ban before it’s too late.”
“If Judge Roberts and the U.S. Supreme Court immediately resolve this toxic and unprecedented situation, our country will be in very serious trouble!” he said.
