As a federal judge Over the record, the national order was slammed by orders that blocked President Donald Trump, with some reexamining how everyone’s confirmation was confirmed and whether Republicans could foresee their ruling or do more to stop them.
Senator Josh Hawley, R-Mo.The powerful Senate Judiciary Committee member told Fox News in an interview: “That’s why I think I vote against every Biden judge.”
He admitted that many judges were confirmed before his time given his first election in 2018.
Spoon: Chuck Grassley, top Republican party
Donald Trump and Judges James Boasberg, Amir Ali and Ana Reyes (Valerie Plesch/D.C./Senatordurbin via YouTube/Bill Pugliano via Getty Images)
“People said to me, ‘Why don’t you vote Biden’s judge?‘ he said. “That’s why.”
“Because if they are unfaithful to the rule of law, then you can bet they are just looking for opportunities for political intervention.”
Since Trump took office, he has faced a series of nationwide bans to stop his administration’s actions, which have outperformed the numbers his predecessors have seen. So far, the court has hit him with about 15 extensive orders in his new term, more than former Presidents George W. Bush, Barack Obama and Joe Biden have received throughout his tenure.
Some of the people who ordered the Trump administration to stop certain actions were U.S. District Judges James Boasberg, Amir Ali, Loren Alikhan, William Alsup, Deborah Boardman, John Coughenour, Paul A. There are 94 districts in the United States, with at least one district court in each state. These courts are the places where the case is first heard before an appeal to the Supreme Court.
Senate confirms Dr. Marty Makary as Trump’s FDA chief
President Donald Trump and U.S. District Judge James Boasberg (Getty)
Several of these judges have been confirmed in the Senate in a bipartisan manner, and some have no opposition. There are others who object to every Republican senator.
One of the most controversial judges, Boasberg, known for blocking critical immigration actions by the Trump administration, was confirmed after being nominated by Obama in 2011. The vote was 96-0, and no Republicans opposed him.
“I think Republicans once expected that when President Trump took office, we’ve seen the legal attacks we’ve seen.” Former Trump lawyer Jim Trusty told Fox News Numbers.
“Unfortunately, the nature of some activists in federal district court judges is a national injunction against the executive branch, putting pressure on the court of appeals, including Scotus, to address these issues,” he explained.
But, he said, the real problem was the “army of lawyers”, he said, trying to “bend and distort legal principles.”
“Even if it means sitting down with Venezuelan gang members who have entered the U.S. illegally, they are spending their days spending time blocking President Trump’s agenda,” Trusty claimed.
Republican senator says Dr. Oz ignores his issues with transgender issues
Venezuelan immigrants arrived in Caracas, Venezuela after being deported from the United States on March 24, 2025. (Reuters/Leonardo Fernandez Viloria)
Andy McCarthy, a former U.S. lawyer and Fox News contributor, told Fox News that “Republicans can do better in blocking Biden’s judicial appointment.”
He pointed to Biden’s recent lame presidency, referring specifically to the nominee “screaming” due to Republican absence.
“Biden’s nominees are very radical and should be opposed as much as possible,” he said. “These are lifelong dates and for decades the progressives who fill these slots will sting on the side of the country.”
But, former Deputy Attorney General John Yoo said: “There is no way to know how they will rule in future cases.”
He believes that senators can do their best to do their due diligence, but they don’t see the future.
“The Senate has the right to reject nominees that it believes would misinterpret the Constitution, but nominees also have an obligation not to promise that once they join the case, they can make a decision on the case.”
Thomas Jipping, a senior legal researcher at the Center for Legal and Justice Studies at Edwin Meese III, noted at the Heritage Foundation that Fox News Digital noted that senators “can’t use fillibuster to defeat judges,” making it even more difficult to stop controversial nominees.
“The only way to really beat someone’s confirmation is to have the majority of the votes,” he explained. “If Republicans are in a minority, at least a few Democrats have to vote against the Democratic candidate to beat someone.”
Fox News Digital with R-Ky. Former Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell contacted Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grasley (R-Iowa) to comment on how the judges could be confirmed.
Top Dem uses the same app in the Atlantic scandal to connect with Steele Dossier author
McConnell’s office did not address the issue of judges who were unanimous or did not object. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)
Ask the senator if he is still satisfied with the judge’s confirmation and personal vote. They were also asked if there was anything shocking in the judge’s record, whether Republicans were enough to stop certain confirmations.
McConnell’s office pointed out Fox News Digital’s comments on legislative stores during a Kentucky press conference.
He told reporters that he said “The way to consider all these restructuring efforts of the government is legal… they will be defined in the court,” he told reporters. “I can understand the desire to reduce government spending. Every government (some are not so bold) is trying to do this one way or another. It’s a different approach… The court will ultimately decide whether the president has the right to take these various steps. Some people may have different outcomes, like all of us – I just wait and actually wait and whether it will wait and whether it will, whether that will allow it.”
Click here to get the Fox News app
Grassley’s office pointed to a previous statement by Senator spokesman Clare Slattery.
“Recently, the district judge’s thorough announcement decision deserves a harsh scrutiny. The Senate Judiciary Committee will take a closer look at the topic at the hearing and explore potential legislative solutions in the coming weeks,” she said.
The committee clearly advocates for a hearing on the national ban next week.
