NewYou can listen to Fox News articles now!
Honestly: When most people hear “tariffs”, they consider price increases and trade wars. But the latest from the Trump administration Tariff promotion Not only is a knee protectionist move, but it is part of a broader strategy.
What is actually playing here is a high-risk effort to build leverage and resources to manage US debtreset its industrial base and renegotiate its position in the global order.
How We Arrive at Liberation Day: See Trump’s Past Comments on Tariffs
It all starts with problems that most people are not told.
In 2025, the U.S. government must refinance $9.2 trillion in mature debt. About $6.5 trillion will expire in June. That’s not a typo, it’s a debt wall for a small continent.
Now, here is the math: Finance Minister Scott Bessentthe rate of interest at each basis point (one percent percent) has saved the government about $1 billion a year. Since the tariffs were announced on April 2, the 10-year fiscal yield has dropped from 4.2% to 3.9%, which is a 30 basis point decline. If anything, it would translate into $30 billion in savings.
U.S. President Donald Trump commented on reciprocity tariffs in a Rose Garden held in the White House in Washington, D.C. on April 2, 2025.
(Getty Image)
Therefore, keeping low returns is not only a reasonable policy, but also a financial necessity.
But we are in a difficult environment. Inflation has not yet fully cooled down and the Fed remains vigilant about lowering interest rates. So the question becomes: How can you reduce surrender without the help of the Fed?
This is where strategy becomes interesting.
By introducing widespread tariffs, it is the government that drives economic uncertainty to drive investors towards safer assets that drive economic uncertainty such as the long-term U.S. Treasury Department. When the market is scared, capital will exit risk and stock assets (as we see as the stock market crash we see) and pile it up in safe assets, mainly U.S. fiscal bonds for 10 years. Demand-driven production is lower.
This is a counterintuitive move, but a calculated move. Some call it an overheated financial system “detox”. And it seems to be working.
But even cheaper debt doesn’t solve everything. The deficit is still big, and that’s where spending is cut.
Elon Musk’s governor has pledged to cut the $1 trillion deficit. (Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images)
The government reportedly cuts in daily spending with the support of the Department of Efficiency (Doge) and Elon Musk. If their recommendations translate into cuts and are approved by Congress, that could reduce the deficit by trillions by the second half of 2025.
At this point, we have two pillars: lower borrowing costs and tighter spending. But there is still a third (arguably the most important) gross profit: growth.
Tariffs are used as ignition switches. By making imports more expensive, they provide space for U.S. producers to re-insert. The goal is not to punish trading partners – even long enough to rebuild critical capabilities, it is to make domestic industries viable again.
Yes, the price will rise. But the government is fully aware of this. In fact, it is loading pain, hoping to provide visible job growth and factory activity ahead of the November 2026 midterm elections.
Meanwhile, the tariffs themselves will generate revenue, estimated to be $700 billion or more in the first year. This creates more fiscal space for the government to enable tax cuts and continue to spend on social security, Medicaid and other programs.
The pictures become more interesting in the geopolitical aspect.
These tariffs do not exist in a vacuum. They are deploying with the intentional reshaping of the global alliance. The United States is quietly alienating NATO, recalibrating its ties with Europe and opening up previously frozen diplomatic channels with Gulf countries and Russia.
Why? Because the post-Cold War trade orders no longer provide us with benefits. It enables deficits, offshore and strategic dependencies. Now, tariffs become leverage. Allies who are prioritized with us are relieved; others face higher costs.
China is naturally a central player. For years, economists have believed that its artificially weak currency and industrial overbearing distorted global trade. Tariffs are a way to force estimates and may be a revaluation of the yuan.
Other countries will not be spared. European terms can be requested for Ukraine. India may be under pressure to cut tariffs. Canada and Mexico may face demand related to fentanyl and border enforcement.
Click here for more Fox News comments
This is not random. This is a trade policy and a means to force the state to participate in the negotiations.
At home, the political logic is also clear. These sectors are most likely to benefit – steel, automobiles, textiles – concentrated in battlefield states. The government bets that visibility of these regions will outweigh the short-term pain of sectors that rely on cheap imports.
Click here to get the Fox News app
There are serious risks here. If inflation returns or re-bet fails, the rebound can be severe. But there is no doubt: this is not improvisation. This is a destruction of design.
Agree or not, this is one of the most ambitious fiscal and industrial resets of a generation.
The only question left is – will it work?
