Blog Post

Prmagazine > News > News > Elbridge Colby clears hurdle, moves to final vote to become Pentagon’s top policy strategist
Elbridge Colby clears hurdle, moves to final vote to become Pentagon’s top policy strategist

Elbridge Colby clears hurdle, moves to final vote to become Pentagon’s top policy strategist

this Senate A lawsuit was filed on Monday for the nomination of Elbridge Colby, moving the national security strategist to the Pentagon’s third-place deputy deputy secretary of policy, bringing the national security strategist closer.

The program vote limited debate and raised the final confirmation vote and passed the Armed Services Commission nomination last month by 53 to 49, overcoming hawkish Republican skepticism in a closed vote.

Elbridge Colby, policy nominee for US President Donald Trump

Senate votes on US President Donald Trump’s policy nominee Elbridge Colby (Kent Nishimura/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Colby, the co-founder of the Marathon Initiative, is a deputy assistant deputy secretary of defense under the Trump administration’s leadership in strategy and force development, known for his role in formulating a 2018 defense strategy that redirects a long-term military strategy to achieve competition with China’s powerful forces.

He has long argued US Army Its resources need to be limited in the Middle East pivot to the Indo-Pacific region.

Colby has gained a firm support from many of the Trump world’s numbers, increasing pressure on Republican skeptics to nominate his nomination.

Vance visited Capitol Hill and urged Senators to confirm Elbridge Colby as the Pentagon. 3 posts

Vice President JD Vance shook hands with Elbridge Colby at a hearing on the Senate Armed Services Committee, who sat at the witness table and smiled at Vance.

U.S. Vice President JD Vance travels to Capitol Hill to urge senators to vote for Colby (Nishimura/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Vice President JD Vance Visited Capitol Hill last month to support his “friend” Colby.

“In many ways, Bridge predicted that we were going to talk about four years, five years on the road, ten years on the road.

“If you look at his long career in defense policy, what he said, frankly, Democrats and Republicans. He also said something I think Democrats and Republicans would agree.”

At the hearing, Senate Armed Committee Chairman R-Miss. The specified location, “The United States has a strong interest in defending Taiwan, but without it, Americans can survive.”

“Your point of view The importance of Taiwan It seems to have been greatly alleviated to the United States,” Wick told Colby.

Colby disputes this, believing he has been sending an alarm that the U.S. “military balance has declined” Go to China.

The main conservative panel said the Defense Department nominee was the “best person” to implement Trump and Heggs’ agenda.

Colby and Cotton, a skeptic about his nomination

Senator Tom Cotton, R-ark. (Getty Image)

“I’ve been trying to shoot the outbreak of signals that for us, focusing and making our troops effective and reasonable defense of Taiwan, Taiwan and the Japanese to do more,” Colby said.

When being pressured by cotton at the hearing, Colby said he believed Iran was a “existent” threat to the United States

“Yes, Iranian nuclear weapons – especially the Senators, given that … we know they have committed to the ICBM-wide capabilities and other capabilities that will pose an existential danger to the United States,” Colby said.

If diplomacy with Iran fails, he promises to provide the president with a “credible and good military choice.”

This is different from his singing in the past few years.

Click here to get the Fox News app

“The only thing worse than the prospect of arming nuclear weapons in Iran is the consequences of using force to try to stop them,” Colby said in 2012.

“I would say a lot of things I was against at the time, and it was these conversations from 15 years ago, and I felt a lot of opponents had casual, or in some cases even attitudes toward hiring military power,” Colby said. “That’s a lot of things I was against. My wording was always appropriate, and my exact framework was always appropriate? No.”

Source link

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

star360feedback