Blog Post

Prmagazine > News > News > Trump asks Supreme Court to block ‘gender identity’ passports
Trump asks Supreme Court to block ‘gender identity’ passports

Trump asks Supreme Court to block ‘gender identity’ passports

President trump card Catch the transgender person back Supreme Court On Friday, the Justice was asked to block the lower court’s ruling, which would force him to issue a passport that matches the applicant’s own gender identity, and said it was inconsistent with the “scientific reality.”

lawyer D. John Sauer The passport mentioned is not a place for freedom of speech or personal expression, but a form of communication with other governments belonging to the president’s foreign policy power. Refused to let the president formulate policies that violate his powers.

“The U.S. passport is a government document; it represents the government’s speech, not the interviewees’ speech,” he said.

President Biden created a gender-friendly passport that allowed Americans to choose M, F, or even X. gentlemen. trump card An executive order was issued to revoke this and return to the previous passport to “accurately reflect the gender of the holder.”

gentlemen. trump card Say it is safer and safer than relying on “subjective self-awareness”.

“The policy is clearly legal. The Constitution does not prohibit the government from defining gender based on the biological classification of individuals.” Saul Tell the justice when filing an application High Court Prevent the lower court’s ruling on the matter.

U.S. District Court Judge Julia Kobick court In Massachusetts, a ban was issued to remove Mr. Trump’s National policy.

She ruled that the restrictions were illegal discrimination based on gender, citing 2020 Supreme Court The case found employment discrimination against trans people was illegal.

The First Circuit Court of Appeals supports Judge Kobeck’s ruling.

gentlemen. SaulHowever, the case is closer to last semester Supreme Court Rulings on medical treatment involving transgender children. In this case, the Justice did not find gender discrimination in state laws that restrict such treatment.

Lawyers asked the justices to issue the case to prevent the lower court from taking effect when the case continues to develop.

Source link

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

star360feedback Recruitgo