I’ve seen it in recent years Ongoing debate What rights must be made by AI companies Utilize copyrighted materials. The latest development prompts the scale of support for use: The judge rejects initial bids from Universal Music Group, ABKCO and other music publishers to stop human lyrics to train its AI assistant Claude, Reuters Report.
U.S. District Court Judge Eumi Lee ruled that UMG and CO made too extensive requests and failed to prove that human use of lyrics has resulted in the company’s “irreparable harm.” “Publishers essentially require courts to define the outline of the licensing market for AI training in order to keep the threshold issues of fair use unstable,” Lee said.
The case dates back to 2023, when UMG joined some music publishers to sue person-defective copyright infringement. They claim that humans use and distribute copyrighted materials, including at least 500 songs. “Anothermodified copyright infringement is not innovation; in layman’s words, it is theft.”
Both sides are here Partial agreements In January this year. Humans have confirmed that it will maintain the current guardrail for copying, displaying or distributing copyrighted material. It also agreed to provide a “quick” overview of the copyright issues of music producers, outlining the plans it planned or why it would not do so in a personal case.
