According to a new thing, journalists covering the Pentagon must sign a promise to confirm that they will not use any information that has not yet been officially released. 17 pages of the Ministry of Defense memorandum Latest restrictions have been put in place on media covering the U.S. military.
In the memorandum, the Department of Defense (President Trump gave the secondary “Ministry of War”) explains in detail when the agreement surrounding journalists entering the Pentagon area needs to be accompanied by reporters to bypass the sprawling complex, which is the process of removing equipment from the scene and other policies.
However, the most influential part involves the collection and use of classified information, sensitive materials or any other information that the Department of Defense has not yet officially cleared for the collection and use of public information. This section sets out the limitations on the use of such information. The initial documents required to acknowledge that their news certificates (most of the “hard passes” that cover full-time journalists in the Pentagon) could be revoked.
“The Dow remains committed to transparency promoting accountability and public trust. However, Dow Information must be approved by appropriate authorized officials before it is released, even if unclassified,” the memo said.
“Under Executive Order 13526 and the Atomic Energy Act, National Security Information (CNSI) must be protected under Executive Order 13556 (CUI) and designated as controlled unclassified information (CUI) under Executive Order 13556,” the memorandum continued. ” “Access to access is only available when eligible for access, signing an approved undisclosed agreement and requiring knowledge of authorized personnel. Dow Jones Industries may only provide CUI for individuals. When there are legitimate governmental purposes to do this, the security risks of CNSI or CUI may be compromised. Dangerous.”
Later in the document, reporters must initially say that their news pass can be revoked or suspended, “based on unauthorized access, unauthorized access, or unauthorized CNSI or CUI disclosure.”
Document: Pentagon Media Memorandum
National News Club President Mike Balsamo exploded new policies in a statement.
“The Pentagon now requires journalists to sign assurances to avoid obtaining or reporting any information (even if not classified), unless explicitly authorized by the government. This is a direct attack on independent journalism where independent censorship is most important: the U.S. military.” “If news about our military must be obtained first, the public will no longer be given an independent report. It will only get what officials want them to see. This should shock every American.”
The main story involving the U.S. military for decades, which dates back to the Vietnam-era Pentagon documents, and the 2004 Abu Ghraib prison scandal, was broken among many other cases as journalists struggled to acquire, verify and subsequently publish or broadcast sensitive information. These efforts have been at the heart of how journalists cover the military and the federal government as a whole.
Recently, several compelling examples have already brought together sensitive information into the media. In one case, sensitive information appears to have been directly provided to U.S. lawmakers, who posted sensitive information at public hearings.
Last month, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth fired Lieutenant General Jeffrey Kruse of the Defense Intelligence Agency, which released a controversial report assessing the losses of U.S. air strikes to Iran’s nuclear program in June. The report leaked to the media a few days after the U.S. air strike and claimed that Iran’s nuclear program had recovered for months in just a few months.
The assessment contradicts the public statements of President Trump and Mr. Heggs.
Earlier this month, at a congressional hearing by U.S. Rep. Eric Burlison. A video he said was played, which was shot by our drone last October and seemed to show a Hellfire missile bounced from an UFO, while the mysterious craftsmanship remained unaffected by the strike on its flight path.
The Pentagon will not confirm whether the video is real or comes from a military aircraft.
