NewYou can listen to Fox News articles now!
A few hours before he was assassinated, Charlie KirkThe last batch of Facebook posts include Wall Street Journal article About the growing national impact Kentucky’s landmark child custody lawsit has a refuted presumption that equal parenting time is in the best interest of the child.
The WSJ article points out that the divorce rate in Bluegrass has declined due to historical laws and how four more states passed similar laws. But there is another compelling reason for both parties to promote shared parenting: voters want it, and evidence shows that it affects the way they vote. Moreover, the more voices a political candidate are, the more votes they receive, the more votes they receive.
Kentucky’s common parenting law roars life after the upcoming fall elections show Directly related Between the proportion of winning controversial games and the legislators’ support for the bill. In the controversial House competition, 100% of sponsors won, 90% of those who voted “yes” won, 80% of those who did not vote won the championship, and those who did not voted “no” won. In fact, despite 14 seats that changed the party, Bill sponsors in each campaign won the victory again.
The new parental guide launches the concept of helping K-12 students’ parents navigate the “wake” in their children’s schools. (via Getty Image iStock)
Republicans and Democrats shouldn’t be surprised by this, as voters keep telling them that they support shared parenting. It’s not just in Kentucky. National Parent Organization has Commissioned independent polls In 29 states and shared parenting, each has strong support, red and blue. Most Republicans and Democrats not only support this legislation, but so do most of each population. It doesn’t matter that men, women, men, African Americans or Hispanics are investigated. They all show a majority support for shared parenting.
Kirk’s position in favor of the Equal Guardianship Act cleverly guides parties to promote common parenting as it makes voters more likely to provide support to either party. Either side gets extra voters in swinging states like North Carolina can swing the election. Additionally, Tar Heel national voters loudly tell the parties how to get more votes: through shared parenting. A surprising 94% said they were “more likely to vote for a candidate who supports children as equal or nearly equal time as each parent…when both parents are healthy and willing to be parents.” Pennsylvania’s crucial voter told the parties with 91% clip. In Wisconsin, the turning point state of the 2016 presidential election, even higher, accounting for 96%. In every swing state surveyed, candidates can get similar promotions by 94% of Georgia and 95% of New Hampshire voted.
Major Scotus Parental Rights Case attracts McMahon, Mom Free to Rally in Court
Surprisingly, both sides made a significant push to the topic. First, shared parenting seems to be an obvious Democratic issue. The Democratic national brand touts equality, what else is more equal than the equal time for children to custody for both parents? Democrats can promote shared parenting, and it will resonate with their foundations, which requires legal equity in all groups. African-American and LGBTQ individuals have distrust of the legal system, and many believe that if another parent is a white and/or straightforward child, they can accept fair custody of the child. Additionally, the Liberals have spent money on how to fit in with men. Well, only 13% of Kentucky people say it is unlikely that family courts will give men less time to custody on children.
Speaking of men, shouldn’t they be in the Republican side of the gender gap? So why isn’t this an obvious Republican issue? Their basic strength is with men, and the group not only supports shared parenting but also believes they are not treated fairly in court. Additionally, Republicans want to integrate with minorities. Ethnic minority men and women support equal parenting, which includes the crucial Hispanic swing vote.
In a tightly divided country, voters told the parties the same thing Charlie Kirk did: support pro-equal family law. Democrats or Republicans can gain advantage and swing voting barriers in swing states by solving problems that both bases want. Or maybe I should say their current foundation is because of this powerful problem that allows either party to enjoy the other party’s base.
