Seoul,,,,, South Korea – Speak to the President trump card During a state visit on Wednesday, King Charles III of England said: “Our partnership with Australia’s Aukus submarines sets the benchmark for innovation and important collaboration.”
Australian media reported that this episode was a “kaboom” moment.
In the shorthand of the trilateral security agreement between Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States, the United Kingdom and the United States agreed to provide Australia with nuclear attack submarines.
The King’s reference is seen as a less subtle reminder to Mr. trump cardHe has been reluctant to bear the promises of the Biden administration, and the British have not only blamed Americans for their allies and interests in the Indo-Pacific region.
Differences between Europeans and the United States Ukraine National defense is widely known. But the dispute between the U.S. and Western allies is quieter as Americans demand that Europeans take a backward position in Pacific leadership and defense.
Some Washington Numbers think NATO Countries should target their limited capabilities Russiapierces the European conceit accustomed to global influence. However, there is growing global skepticism about Mr. Trump’s The “US First” policy has some Indo-Pacific capitals that link hands with European related defense partnerships and arms deals.
The German Marshal Foundation wrote on September 11: “Historically, the United States is Europe’s closest ally, and the Indo-Pacific is becoming increasingly important to European strategy. Washington’s The approach to China makes it particularly challenging for Europe to open up space for security actors. ”
From wrinkles to crnk?
Chinese President Xi Jinping, North Korean leader Kim Jong-un and Russian President Vladimir Putin were among the leaders of the military parade in Beijing on September 3 to mark the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II in the Pacific.
The obvious absence of reputation positioning is visiting Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian.
Iran is usually trapped in Chinese authoritarian groups. RussiaIran and North Korea – sometimes called wrinkles, but also called “the axis of turbulence” or “the axis of authoritarianism”.
Iran’s military humiliation at the hands of us and Israeli forces swept the status quo.
“They were recently eliminated by them,” Grant Newsham, a former U.S. Marine and diplomat, has extensive experience in the Indo-Pacific.
Tehran’s agents Hamas and Hezbollah have degenerated, their own defenses have been broken, leaving the nuclear site to the mercy of Israeli and American bombers, and their actions have not been lost.
Although Iran is currently in trouble, nuclear weapons China, North Korea and Russia Represents a powerful triad.
All of these are the Indo-Pacific forces with global presence.
although Russia A bloody war was fought on its European border and it maintained an important military presence in the Far East.
Beijing has also deployed a naval fleet around the world, which has been with Russia As far away as the Indian Ocean.
Pyongyang has fought Russia’s Oppose the War Ukraine and is receiving military technology, including from the thankful Moscow.
Democratic countries strive to deal with it
The United States has Atlantic and Pacific seaboards, maintaining a huge impact in the Indo-Pacific region and in Australia, Japan, the Philippines and South Korea. It also informally assumed Taiwan’s defense.
European Atlantic Ocean NATO Members have smaller but active lives in the Indo-Pacific region.
United States-led UN Command – Defends Free World Country South Korea During the Korean War of 1950-1953, representatives from Europe, including France and Britain.
Germany joined in 2024, and European officers said: “To get boots in the Indo-Pacific region.”
However, the United States is prohibited, UNC states have a common defense treaty with South Korea, and there are no ground units.
The Proliferation Security Plan (PSI) has seen European warships patrol regional waters to monitor sanctions against North Korea.
The drill was another phone call to the east. Europe is increasingly sending troops to regional exercises, such as Australia’s black and Talisman uniforms.
In recent years, mid-sized powers in France, Italy and the UK have deployed operator strike groups. These voyages are not only operational: Flight deck cocktails generate diplomatic/commercial public relations.
“The defense diplomatic effort – sending CSG to demonstrate capabilities while promoting potential weapons sales – shows that the British and Europeans have skin in the game,” said Alex Neill, a regional security expert at the Pacific Forum. “But maybe the United States thinks it is a complex effort and they will better use these assets to defend the closer shore.”
Whether European troops prevented the enormous power of Beijing or Pyongyang is questionable.
“I suspect that the Europeans have too small military forces in the Asia-Pacific region and that Europeans have a lot to offer,” Mr. Newsham said. “It’s hard for them to take care of their own areas, let alone where they have to go.”
It is possible that the European CSG may “backfill” the US CSG, thus heading from the European Atlantic to the Indo-Pacific. Some may be like the Royal Navy fighting with the U.S. forces during World War II and the Korean War.
But Deputy Defense Secretary Eldridge Colby deprived the Atlantic Ocean of the Pacific.
He tried to delay the weapons he needed Ukrainethis is the decision of Mr. overturning. trump card.
The limitations of Europe
According to undisclosed reports, in May, Mr Colby told British officials that the Indo-Pacific region did not want their CSG.
The British were obviously stunned: the eight months of the Royal Navy flagship store, ongoing tours, were a senior global mission in London.
In the region, the British CSG cooperates effectively with local forces from India to Japan and the U.S. Navy. A British frigate crossed the Taiwan Strait on September 12, angering Beijing.
But regional deployments exposed restrictions.
“The Royal Navy can’t even come up with a full CSG and needs the help of partner countries,” Neil said. “And, you’ll read about assets crashing all the way.”
London may have succumbed to our pressure.
In July, one of the main drafters of the UK’s strategic defense review told parliament that “the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command … does not have much value in British forces in the region”, causing Britain to refocus on the “Atlantic Fortress.”
Paris has stronger claims about regional existence, which may be Washington.
“The British and the EU are constantly knocking on the global order and freedom of navigation in the Pacific region,” Mr Neil said. “France argues that they are residents of the Indo-Pacific, with 2 million citizens living in the Indian and Pacific.”
Mr. Colby reviewed the 2021 Aukus in June, which can be built by all the submarines the U.S. Navy needs.
if Washington Quashes Aukus, it will humiliate London and Canberra. Both paste it on political and financial capital.
But a source familiar with regional security told The Washington Times that “Bridge (the nickname of Colby’s) is losing Steam.”
US and Australian media reported that Secretary of State Marco Rubio assured Australian officials that Australian officials would continue.
Even so, “America No. 1” is testing the nerves among allies, and previous U.S. cooperation is developing.
“trump cardperhaps unconsciously, in foreign and security policies, the Greater European and Asian innovations in liberal democracies acted as catalysts.
New partnership
In 2023, Japan and the United Kingdom signed a statutory military agreement, enabling rapid and seamless deployment of troops and weapons between the two countries.
Japan is not working with U.S. defense contractors, but with British and Italian partners to develop the sixth-generation stealth fighter jet.
Japan and South Korea They benefit from the alliance with the United States, which requires them to use NATO– Standard equipment. This means their weapons companies can increasingly compete with American microphones.
Although none Seoul Tokyo is not armed with Kiev, and South Korean weapons companies benefit a lot from it. Russia–Ukraine War, selling weapons worth tens of thousands of dollars NATO Countries including Estonia, Norway, Poland, Romania and Türkiye.
Mr. Nilsson-Wright believes that multilateral defensive ties must be maintained or upgraded.
“Intermediate power requires global commitment,” he said. “It makes up for the long-term decline in U.S. influence.”
