“It’s very important to come here today because there are a lot of groups. [Trump] On every level, he should not be in power, and he should not be allowed to be in front of any TV camera, let alone as the president of the United States, where the royal family (I usually believe in caring), is not there. Really not. ”
Like other protesters, Sarah quickly referenced London’s far-right parade last Saturday Attracted more than 100,000 people And exposed the deepening division within British society as a reason for protest.
“It was such a fucking grave mistake to welcome him here with our government and our royal family,” she said. “We were angry. We were all angry.”
Photo: Natasha Bernal
Clive Teague, who supported the extinction rebellion between Waverley and Surrey in the protests, said the AI deal was one of many things the government made mistakes. “[Trump] Is there any [in Windsor] Because we are here. If we weren’t here, he would land in the mall. We’re here to stop him. ”
Teague said he would not object to the use of AI as long as new clean energy is used instead of existing forces. “We cannot continue to burn fossil fuels to continue to enter these data centers because it will flood the demands of the rest of the world.” Other environmental groups, such as Greenpeace, responded in March, which opposed the huge data centers approved without proper assessment of the impact of local water systems and power grids.
“Greenpeace does not object to AI,” said Doug Parr, Greenpeace’s UK chief scientist, in a written statement to Wired. “The billion-pound tech giants that build new data centers should be forced to take some responsibility for the solution, whether it’s using less water or using new, clean renewable energy to run cooling methods. It’s now the government has set some rules and assumes responsibility rather than taking responsibility for the cheerleading responsibilities for the AI sector.”
