NewYou can listen to Fox News articles now!
after Charlie Kirk assassinatedthe United States is looking for the answer. But on Wikipedia, another search is being done. Editors on the website are pushing for the left-wing narrative about Kirk, which is subtle, but for this exact reason – very effective.
The attack on Kirk began with the first sentence of a Wikipedia article, which identified him as the “right wing.” This itself seems immeasurable, but look at the Wikipedia article of comparable characters on the left and no such politicized framework is found. For example, articles about former Obama consultants David Plouffe Identify him as “American political and business strategist” and MSNBC host and political analyst Al Sharpton Described as “American civil rights and social justice activist.” Although these articles do describe their partisan activities, they are not called liberals or leftists at all. Plouffe was even invited to join the “acronym” of “liberal nonprofits.” But he was not called a “liberal.”
The attack continues further in the main paragraph of Kirk’s article, and editors say Kirk is controversial because of his “opposition to gun control, abortion and LGBTQ rights; his criticism of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Martin Luther King Jr, as well as the promotion of the promotion of Christianity, the approval of COVID-DREVINED ADERIDE, and promoted 20 scopes.
The framework ensures that anyone searching for Kirk after the murder encounters a narrative designed to discredit him.
File: Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk speaks at a campaign rally in Las Vegas on October 24, 2024. (AP Photo/John Locher, File)
More importantly, Ryder eats disproportionately Google’s Knowledge Panel and search results and top AI platforms. When I asked chatgpt, Charlie Kirk facilitated Conspiracy theory? ” It answered: “Yes, Conservative activist and founder of Turning Point USA, Charlie Kirk has actively promoted several conspiracy theories throughout his career.” To support this, Chatgpt cites five “conspiracy theories” that Kirk scattered, three of which are pulled directly from the list above. Of the four of these five cases, Chatgpt quotes only one source: Wikipedia.
One way of Wikipedia editing stage is that attacks are allegations by crosslinking between articles. The charge is mainlyCharlie Kirk“He is a proponent of “Christian nationalism” article, and A separate article This illustrates that this view is “believed to overlap with Christian fundamentalism, [W]Hayte supreme, Christianity supreme, the seven-mountain mission movement and dominance. ”
In the newly created article,Kill Charlie Kirk“Editor-Writing Kirk” uses his skills on social media and on campus to become an influential figure in the ‘hard rights movement’,” cited article The New York Times.
David Marcus: Progressive madness kills Charlie Kirk, who was once a generational leader
Wikipedia editors initially accused Kirk of promoting “Marxist conspiracy theories in anti-Semitic culture” in a special section of Kirk’s main article “Promoting False and Conspiracy Theory.” Kirk is widely known as one of the most influential supporters of American Jews.
The article has since been changed to say Kirk “promoted Marxist conspiracy theory and described the university as “the island of totalitarianism.” “One of the articles it linked in the citation is the 2019 article in the Journal of Social Justice.
Click here for more Fox News comments
Hours after his murder, in the “Gun Control” section of the article’s talk page, the editor debated proposing editors, one editor suggested “pointing the significance of Kirk is both an objection to gun control and a gun control statistics.” Another editor argued that Kirk’s 2023 speech – who pointed to the unfortunate consequences of gun death while expressing his support for Second Amendment rights – “will show that he is willing to accept the murder case of this result”. Citations in this speech remain in the Kirk article itself.
An analysis of news sources used as references in the “Charlie Kirk” articles shows that most sources are left or left-leaning, as classified by Allsides. These include multiple citations from The New York Times, The Washington Post, Politics, The Guardian and CNN.
When I asked Chatgpt, “Did Charlie Kirk promote conspiracy theories?” It replied: “Yes – there is solid evidence that conspiracy theories and misinformation advocated or repeated on several topics.
Charlie Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA, died at the age of 31 after shooting on campus in Utah
In Washington, this bias has not attracted people’s attention. In August, the House Oversight Committee opened the official Investigation of Wikimedia Foundationowning and operating the website, requiring documents and records to determine whether foreign or ideological manipulation is shaping the content of the world’s most influential online information source. Naturally, the Wikimedia Foundation did not respond to my inquiries.
Click here to get the Fox News app
Wikipedia is the mainstream wrapping paper media. Its notorious list of “reliable sources” news media that can be used as a reference, and Wikipedia editors consider “reliable” as green, while they believe “unreliable” as red. Green websites read like a semi-official list of mainstream media: The New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, NBC News, CBS News, ABC News, Associated Press. It disproportionately marks that conservative media is unreliable, while giving China a neutral rating every day for its publicity exports.
Obviously, Wikipedia needs to change. However, if there are any signs of mainstream media on which the website relies on, it is unlikely to happen anytime soon. Meanwhile, disproportionate sites for AI and Powers will remain a battlefield, with ideologies on the left and right being barely examined.
