Amy Coney Barrett visits SoCal a day after the Supreme Court’s immigration raid ruling

Ximi Valley – Jadyn Winsett wraps her new engagement ring around her fingers and scans the Navy Marine Sports Jacket, Sailor Stripes and String Pearls at the Presidential Library of Ronald Reagan to get a glimpse of the Supreme Court Justice.

Throughout the room, Amy Coney Barrett, the youngest member of the High Court, stood in the room, with little choice of more dramatic moments.

Barrett joined the conservative majority a day ago, a decision to clear people detained by Federal Emigration Agents in Southern California simply because their skin is brown or speaks Spanish.

Reactions in most of Los Angeles have irritated and worried that the Fourth Amendment has been trampled on.

But at the Reagan Library, emotions are triumphant.

Winsett, 23, and her fiancé are admirers who gather to hear Barrett’s new memoir, “Listen to the Law.” For supporters who emerged, Barrett evokes values ​​cherished by President Trump’s faith-driven aides: mean motherhood, Southern charm, Christian piety and firm constitutional primitiveism.

Winsett, a Texas native, asked the question two days ago at Yosemite National Park. She said the proposal was a highlight of the couple’s California holiday. But the chance to meet Barrett in Reagan’s final resting place was right behind.

“I sent it [my fiance] Winset said that in a few minutes, so many text messages were excited and we had to come. [Barrett’s] This book should expand on Justice Scalia’s “reading method”, which is really cool. “

Barrett barely said the court rise or legal rise behind her most controversial decision on Tuesday’s event, or the legal statement, but instead put the Justice Brett M.

But the previous day’s immigration raid ruling still hovered in the air.

When asked to explain the court’s “shadow case”, she explains the entirety of a hypothesis, almost the same as the real decision Monday.

“Suppose some of the government’s policies have been banned,” Barrett said. “The government may say, ‘When we are litigating this case, it is irreparable to create that injunction and harm us in ways that we cannot recover from irreversible, so please comply with that in the meantime.'”

Later, when asked about the constitutional interpretation, she introduced the slippery text of the Fourth Amendment, the same as the unsigned order on Monday.

“[Look at] Prevent unreasonable searches and protection from seizures,” she invited the audience.

“When you have words like this, ‘unreasonable, there will be a range that everyone will say, outside of that, we all agree that it is unreasonable,” Barrett explained. “Then, there is a range here, and we all say it is reasonable. But, there will be room for a band to have divisions. One of the great things about the Constitution is that it leaves some games in the joints.”

Earlier that night, Barrett and her husband Jesse paid tribute at the Reagan Memorial and briefly admired part of the Berlin Wall, flanked by a group of federal agents, while the protests were protested outside.

Many in the crowd said they were devout Christian believers like Catholic justices and ended abortion as a constitutional right in the United States with a decisive vote.

“I’m a born-up Christian and I believe it’s God’s hand that put her on the court… able to overthrow Roe vs. Wade,” said Pasadena’s Glovioell Dixon, who arrived just hours before the plan to beat the crowd.

Others were directed by Barrett’s law, some of whom mentioned the fact that she had barely used notes during her confirmation hearings, and the fact that she was calm under pressure.

“She is one of the smartest people I’ve ever observed,” said Elizabeth Pierce of Newbury Park. “It’s a chance for a lifetime. ”

Some even attribute to justice that fulfills their American dream.

Sean Chen, 52, of East Los Angeles, said he had just attended his daughter’s medical school white coat ceremony and praised Barrett’s 2023 ruling for ousting racial-based affirmative action in the case of fair admissions with Harvard.

“It’s directly related to the future of my child,” Chen said. “No Supreme Court job [overturning affirmative action]maybe I didn’t even have a chance. ”

Chen, a Chinese immigrant, called for an opportunity to learn from one of the nine American legal lawyers to be part of a “spiritual American.”

According to financial disclosures, Barrett revealed a short story about her memoir, which was paid $425,000 in 2021, the first reported $2 million upfront, according to financial disclosures.

“We’re going to pray that we’re going to sign the book!” As the sun sets on Kingsoft Mountain, an event coordinator encourages those behind the line.

Stubborn fans are reminded not to try selfies, although souvenir photos will be taken and can be purchased after the event is over.

Julia Quiroz, 23, and her mother wait for her book signature.

“I think her career as a mother is a model,” Quiroz said of Barrett.

Her mom Gaby agreed – mostly.

As a Catholic, Quiroz said she agreed to Barrett’s ruling on abortion, but was desperate to realize that the family dream ended the shore-to-shore process.

“She will do the right thing for the country and the law,” Gaby Quiroz said. “I don’t know her decision will always Consistent with ours. ”

Other participants said they were linked to Barrett and her ruling in support of the president’s agenda, what would this impact on neighbors.

“I’m very happy,” said Kevin Rivero of Palmdale. “She is making sure the president has the right to do what the executive has. As a Los Angeles citizen, I do it.”

Pasadena Christian Dixon said that although her ex-husband was once an undocumented immigrant, she agreed to the Supreme Court ruling on immigration attacks that she could have faced deportation if they didn’t get married.

“USA Everyone. We are a passionate country, you know? “Dickson said: “Take us the poor – is this the word about the Statue of Liberty?” That line? I’m all for that. But do this in a way that respects our country. ”