Viewpoint:
The President’s Recent Summit trump card South Korean President Lee Jae-Myung further consolidated his special relationship. It dates back to June 1950, when North Korea Invasion South Koreamistakenly believed that the United States was not interested in defending South Korea Attack from the north.
North Korea’s Leader Kim Il-Sung is wrong. The United States comes to defend South KoreaAfter three years of bloody battles, thousands of casualties were killed and killed, and a armistice was signed in July 1953 to stop the battle, but the Korean War continued.
Given this legacy, Trump-Lee Summit has deliverables – tariffs, trade and investment – but understandably, the most enthusiastic focus is Mr. Mr.’s prospects. trump card Re-engage with Kim Jong-un North Korea. Frankly, our goal should be North Korea and make Mr. King realizes that he has established a normal relationship with the United States and hopes to South Korea,exist North Korea’s interest. Indeed, it will provide North Korea International legitimacy and access to international financial institutions and economic assistance for economic development purposes. This will be the beginning of a new era North Korea and the Korean Peninsula.
There is no doubt that Mr. Jin was impressed by the September 3 Victory Day parade on the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II. He and Chinese President Xi Jinping, next to Russian President Vladimir Putin, must have made Mr. Jin happy that the military parade of reviewing China’s modern military was reviewed. XI, parades and friendships in Putin and Mr. King are on display for the world to enjoy. Another 26 world leaders have heard Xi Jinping’s cover-up criticism of the United States and his announcement that the world faces a choice between “peace and war, dialogue or confrontation.”
The Shanghai Cooperation Organization meeting held by the Shanghai Cooperation Organization on August 31 is another convenient place for Mr. XI – prioritizing the “Global South” in front of Mr. Putin, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and 20 other world leaders, a cover-up criticism of the United States and its tariff policies. Mr. Xi Jinping announced a $1.3 billion Shanghai Cooperation Organization Development Bank fund and provided a message: “We must continue to take a clear position on hegemony and power politics and practice true multilateralism.”
These two major events come from China’s information – the Shanghai Cooperation Organization Summit and Military March – One Week is China is a global power, and Mr. XI is an alternative global leader in the new world order, with its own rules and independent of Western standards.
Unfortunately, the Trump-Pudin summit in Alaska on August 15 failed. Despite Mr.’s publicity trump cardPutin continues to escalate Ukraine with ongoing civilian casualties. Mr. Putin then went to China to attend the Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit and the 80th anniversary military parade, meeting and meeting with XI and Kim, members of the authoritarian state axis and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian.
Xi Jinping’s comments in military parades in Tianjin and Beijing made his final simplicity: Despite the 1994 security in Ukraine, Ukraine, Ukraine, on Budapest Memorandum, or in the world order, Russia either condemns Russia’s infringement on Ukraine, or continues to abide by the world’s rights and respect the rights of the state.
Mr. Kim’s father and grandfather wanted to establish a normal relationship with the United States, as did Mr. Kim’s meeting with Mr. trump card 2018 in Singapore and 2019 in Hanoi. Negotiations between our countries should be resumed as soon as possible, North Korea’s The future is a normal relationship with the United States. South Korea. Details can and will be resolved.
•The author is the former envoy of the Six-Party Talks North Korea and former director of the National Anti-Proliferation Center. All statements expressed by facts, opinions or analysis are statements of the author and do not reflect the official position or opinions of the U.S. government. Nothing in the content should be construed as an assertion or suggestion of the U.S. government’s certification of information or endorsement of the author’s views.
