President Donald Trump has many nominees to serve the Senior Justice Department facing the democratic Senate for a president who is not fully responding to a nominee that they do not fully respond before they can respond to no further details.
“It’s more specific case for me to say, to make a blanket statement about that,” Aaron Reitz, which Trump has chosen a lawyer’s lawyer, told Sen. Dick Durbin, Dick., The ranking member of the committee. Durbin asked If a selected officer should be permitted to disobey a court order.
Followed the Durbin, asking what circumstances Reitz, which served as GOP Ted Cruz’s Chief’s Chief of Staff, justify ignoring a court order.
“All I can say is that there are some instances where a public official in accordance with the duty tied by holding a particular court, where the official should be bound,” Reitz said. “I can’t say either the ranked Durbin member, for all moments where the dynamics can or not play a specific suit.”
The first issue of Trump administration as Vice President JD Vacece, etc. Criticized the number and width of judicial judicial Against Trump Administration policies, social media posts “Judges will not be allowed to prevent legitimate power of executive.”
John Sauer, Trump’s nominated to be US Solicitor General, also asks the difficulty to evaluate a hypothetical when the Durbin begged him to listen to Wednesday.
“I don’t want to say hypothetical, especially hypotheticals that can come before me in an official capacity, if I have been confirmed by the Senate,” as Sauer, who served as a lawyer in Missouri General and represents Trump before the US Supreme Court last year.
Sauer added that “generally, if there is a direct court order binding a federal or state officer, they should follow it.”
In further inquiries from Durbin about his use of the word “usually” and if there are acceptable exceptions to following court orders, which I cannot think of a hypothetical one way or another. “
Sauer then asked 1944 Korematsu v. Case in the United States, which American Americans supported internation during World War, and 1857 dred Scott v. Sandford Case, where The Supreme Court says enslaved people are not US citizens and exception of protection from federal government or in courts.
The 13th and 14th changes in the Constitution troubleshooting the Dred Scott’s decision by eliminating the bondage and establishment of birthright, which effectively breakdown. And while the korematsu decision was not formally extinguished, the chief justice john roberts called it “extreme wrong” In an unrelated 2018 casein an unrelated 2018 Case and wrote that It is “defeated by the court of history, and – to clear – there is no place of law under the Constitution.”
“I just think if some historians may think we’d better if [Korematsu] Not followed, “Sauer Durbin said.
After Wednesday of hearing, Sen. Cory Booker, DN
Booker specifically asks a tweet to Reitz’s, where Booker says Reitz “compare Dred Scott Descycle to court decision of the same sex marriage.”
Reitz said The booker is the trunk of his question “is less hypothetical for me to meet accuracy.”
After listening, Democratic Senates have measured support from Sen. John Kennedy, R-la. That issued a warning of nominees in decisions of federal courts.
“Don’t, whenever, take the position you don’t follow the order of a federal court. Nevertheless you will. You may not agree with it.” Kennedy may be able to participate, “said Kennedy, before full criticism of the Biden administration. “For four years, I watched people in this town – not all, no, not all – but many have tried to harm the federal lehiquariary and this is my gag reflex.
“Now all our judiciary … is legitimate. It is not an army,” Kennedy added.
