NewYou can listen to Fox News articles now!
President Donald Trump It is correct that state and local school boards should control students’ education. They did so, and they had it since our Republic. However, he decided to relate the decision of the Department of Education (the only federal department dedicated to providing educational opportunities for all students in the United States) to control, efficiency and even test scores. It’s about reallocating money and opportunities from many to few.
From courses to graduation requirements, states and local school districts have controlled education. Provided by the federal government $1 $1 per $7 In public schools, 90% of American children participate. This funding is crucial to helping everyone create opportunities and ensure that poor children, disabled children and first-generation college students have the same success rates as everyone else. Which countries rely the most on this funding? Red country, Because they have more children who are eligible for Congressional grants and distributed by the education department.
Federal funds are not used to impose any course or ideology (actually permitted by law) and no such laws and norms should be violated regardless of the president. Likewise, funds should not be used as cudgels to force educators to ko ko with any political ideology or personal beliefs.
Senators formally propose bills to eliminate the Ministry of Education
Although the Education Department was founded by Congress in 1979 on a bipartisan basis, support for public schools has deeper roots. Lyndon B. Johnson teaches in a countryside Texas Students showed up without shoes and when he became president, he took action to support children who grew up in poverty. Every president except the current foundation is built on this foundation.
Trump cannot abolish the education department. Only Congress can do this. So he and Elon Musk Pool ball, First, nearly half of the employees need to be fired Then Plan to wrap it in pieces To others Understaffed departments There is little relevant expertise or necessary resources, and this move is something that some people Republicans are questioning.
It is impossible to imagine how there are 7.5 million children with disabilities, 26 million children from low-income families, or 13 million young people receiving financial aid from colleges if no one comes to make sure the funds are available, or even answer calls. The teacher will be fired. Class size will increase. And students with the least resources and the greatest need will pay the highest price.
Linda McMahon: I eliminate the vision of the Ministry of Education
Mississippi, Recent reading score reboundnearly a quarter of the funding was obtained from federal sources, followed by South Dakota, Montana, Arkansas, North Carolina, Kentucky, Arizona, Oklahoma, and Tennessee, with about 20% of school funds being obtained from the federal government. By comparison, New York state accounts for only 7.2%.
Whether the funds are used to pay tax cuts on billionaires or school coupons, it means kids suffer.
We are concerned about struggling readers, children who need speech or occupational therapy, and families who benefit from in-class and after-school programs. If the family can’t afford the bill, who will provide them with coaching or the experts they need? Who will investigate parents’ complaints about the removal of most civil rights officers’ offices in violation of their children’s civil rights at school?
I think of a 11th grade student at Widener Memorial School Philadelphiathe only school in Pennsylvania that specializes in special education students. The student was in a wheelchair. If the money is taken away, how will she get the physical and occupational therapy she needs to thrive?
educate Secretary Linda McMahon suggests The production of Title I funding, currently designated as a high dive community school, is a stringless block grant that cannot be guaranteed to serve and obtain immediately for students and schools that desperately need it.
For example, states can use federal funds for private school credentials, so those who currently receive these services in public schools will lose. Who will win? Data shows that this is indeed a reallocation of wealth. Money is no longer a poor child. instead, 70% of public funds Voucher, wealthy families already have children in private schools. In the last election, voters rejected private school certificates They support public schools wherever they are on the ballot.
Click here for more Fox News comments
If money doesn’t change the success of students, it won’t fight for it. Newer research shows that anyone with common sense knows: Money is important. rSearch the vast majority of displays This increases K-12 funding Improve students’ academic achievements, Especially for children living in poverty. However, this government is taking us on a trajectory to achieve less at a rate.
Trump’s ending around Congress is not only illegal, but overwhelming unwelcome. Whether people know the education department’s job or not, they don’t like to turn off the messages they send. Americans don’t want their president to divest children and young people.
Finally, close Ministry of Education The choice to set up Hobson is because, in order to maintain current services, families will eventually pay more state and local taxes. So we end up getting tax cuts from the rich and taxes for everyone else increased.
The country has been struggling from the chaos and cut funds. Government Sudden stop in federal pandemic aid spending State officials shocked last month Let them rush to sue. Grant learning effective reading and math courses to address teacher shortages in rural communities to help people with disabilities navigate Life after high school graduation and Citizen Education Program Everything I once taught was stopped.
Click here to get the Fox News app
this The stern is fighting Trump’s actions, including in the court. That’s not because the department is a perfect institution. no. Tests should be cancelled and paperwork should be reduced. Like any entity, it will undoubtedly be more effective. We should also do more to improve vocational and technical education and make it a viable path for students with preparatory colleges, which is something that I and I believe in Secretary McMahon.
But go The role of the Federation in education– This is an equilibrium opportunity – not only illegal, but also wrong, especially by funding vouchers that voters don’t want, or offering tax cuts to those who don’t need it. We must protect our children and our communities.
